Posted on

Two New Tenors

Two who responded to the fundraising appeal are tenors. It struck me that I should share them with you, so I invited them to submit some clips.

Please enter your opinion about them. We’ll publish the results in a forthcoming newsletter.




“I am much honored to contribute to the publishing of your book “Hitler’s Tenor.” This is a very interesting topic and unusual perspective about the life of one of the greatest tenors of the history of opera. Gigli sang in troubled war times and found himself in the middle of a game bigger than he thought. He never imagined that the political leaders he sang for and who used him as an instrument of their political propaganda during the 1930s would have been banned from power only a decade after. That is why I find your initiative of writing a book about Gigli’s connection with Hitler and Mussolini a novelty. Thank you, Stefan, for enriching opera fans with your valid intellectual work!
—Enrique Pina”

The Roman commission, which found against Gigli, made no mention of Hitler, Mussolini or events when Italy and Germany were allies. Instead the commission focused on Gigli’s actions from September 1943, when the Germans occupied Rome, to June 1944, when the American Fifth Army ousted them. For the commission this was the period of Gigli’s collaboration.
—Stefan Zucker


I interviewed Enrique Pina in Franco Corelli and a Revolution in Singing: Fifty-Four Tenors Spanning 200 Years, vol. 3. As discussed in the book, he had studied with Corelli for a number of years but ultimately modified the technique so he would have greater stamina. In “E lucevan le stelle” he is using Corelli’s technique. In “Por Amor” by Rafael Solano, Enrique Pina, tenor, Alberto Rincon Guzman, conductor, and “Granada” he is using his modified technique.






“My contribution is a symbolic  one—a sign of my deep respect and admiration for your work and for what you represent to the Opera world. I wish more singers would have contact with your knowledge.”






“German-Brazilian tenor Martin Muehle was born in Porto Alegre in Brazil and studied at the Musikhochschule in Lübeck, Germany.

“He opened the 2018–19 season with his return to Oper Köln as Calàf and will make his US debut at Seattle Opera as Manrico. He also will appear at Teatro Communale di Modena, Teatro Regio di Parma, Teatro Reggio di Emilia and Fondazione Teatro di Piacenza as Andrea Chénier, and at Staatstheater Hamburg as Don José. He’ll return to the Bolshoi Theater for performances of Carmen conducted by Tugan Sokhiev and to MÜPA Budapest for a semi-staged performance of Le villi. He’ll finish the season with a return to Teatro Massimo di Palermo as Canio, conducted by Daniel Oren. Future seasons include his debut with Théâtre du Capitole, Toulouse and a return to Deutsche Oper, Berlin.

“In South America Martin Muehle sang Don José in Brasilia and Buenos Aires, Turiddu in Brasilia, Siegmund in La Plata and at Theatro Municipal in São Paulo, where he also sang Alfonso in Korngold’s Violanta and Guido in Zemlinsky’s Eine florentinische Tragödie.

“In concert he has sung Gounod’s St. Cecilia Mass at the Theatro Municipal in São Paulo, Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 at the Cathedral of Porto Alegre and at Palácio das Artes in Belo Horizonte as well as Mahler’s Das Lied von der Erde at the Teatro Nacional in Brasilia. Recently he also sang Das Lied von der Erde conducted by Dan Ettinger in Mannheim and Ludwigsburg, and in his debuts at the Berliner Philharmonie as tenor soloist in Verdi’s Requiem with the Rundfunk-Sinfonieorchester and Rundfunkchor, Berlin under the baton of Simon Halsey and at the Gewandhaus in Leipzig with the MDR Symphony.

“In the 2017–18 season Muehle made his role and house debut at Teatro Massimo, Palermo as Maurizio opposite Angela Gheorgiu and conducted by Daniel Oren. He also gave his role debut as Manrico in a new production of Il trovatore at Konzert Theater, Bern. He returned to the National, Mannheim as Calàf and then gave his house debut at Teatro Petruzelli, Bari as Andrea Chénier. He ended the season with three productions of a signature role, Don José, at the National Theatre, Prague, Konzert Theater, Bern and the Bregenz Festival in the summer of 2018.”—Martin Muehle


1/21/2019 8:13 PM

Muehle sings the way so many singers do today: all that seems to matter is volume, which makes it hard to produce the sounds physically. You hear the struggle. That also excludes any beauty, emotion, personality, because he has no access physically. He has locked himself up. Of course you must call it an impressive –but dead-sound.

Pina: I liked E lucevan. He could change his sound. Some expression. I disliked Granada. Struggled, held. He had trouble actually singing it.

Of course neither of them is an amateur! They sound like the best of the “B” singers out there!

—Henriette Lund

1/21/2019 8:20 PM

Mr Pina’s placement is ingolata.  Mr Muehle, similar to Corelli’s placement (lowered Larynx). He has to be very careful never to push the voice while maintaining the squillo throughout. I would suggest to Mr. Pina, listen to Giuseppe di Lugo, Georges Thill, and Mario Lanza, the latter, who studied with Rosati and influenced Placi and other tenors. It would help to preserve the voice. Corelli’s voice and technique were unique, which, could be difficult for a sensitive, vocal instrument.
—Bella Smith

1/21/2019 8:28 PM

The Elucevan Le Stelle by Tenor Pina has the right weight and impact and sound nice but overall lack the rhythm because of late entries. [He is referring to the version of “E lucevan le stelle” linked to in the original survey newsletter.] The other 2 examples I do not care for.

Tenor Muehle reminds me of Corelli as far as the quality of sound is concerned and is impressive but not quite effortless. However I do like his rendition of the arias submitted.


1/21/2019 8:57 PM

Martin Muehle is dear friend of mine and and a great artist that is each day getting better and better … so proud of him and the great career he’s doing. My best wishes and “In bocca al lupo” always!
—Eloisa Baldin

1/21/2019 9:58 PM

We need to monitor there progress.

1/22/2019 1:08 AM

Pina has a nice, somewhat dryish tenor, and showed a bit more imagination in the TOSCA aria than in the songs, especially in “Por amor”, which is a real go-nowhere song that can do nothing for any tenor singing it. Has some style, but lacks charisma. Muehle sounded much more exciting, with a more truly ‘operatic’ voice than Pina possesses, along with more feeling and a reasonable amount of charisma. It is hard to gauge voice size with the amplification used in “Ch’ella mi creda” or the long-distance videoing of the TURANDOT scene. (I couldn’t take my eyes off the soprano’s upper arms in the LECOUVREUR long enough to judge Muehle; she should really insist on a new wardrobe!) Sounds like a good pingy top, and he certainly is effective in the three cries of “Turandot”, holding the last ala Corelli for a good while, and then he shows considerable presence of mind when his gong-striker falls out of his hand after the first strike, he thinks quickly about picking it up, and then changes his mind and just uses his fist to strike the gong the second and third times. Altogether, both good tenors, but Muehle is the definite winner here.


—Joe Pearce

1/22/2019 2:49 AM

I will refer to Martin Muehle that Im very, very glad how he sings at South America in so many theatres. did a licence in Communications here at Jo”burg, S. A., and I get so excited when I have the great opportunity to see that even he was singing at the famous Teatro Municipal from la Plata, if well I belong to Buenos Aires city, developing a big carrere at different centres of my born city, I have the chance to travel to South America and Europe) but believe me that is all my pleasure to listen on his biography all this wonderful description.
Thank you very much.


—Prof. C. A. DEVORIK

1/22/2019 9:26 PM

I found that the voice of Enrique PIna is of an unusual brilliance and squillo. Pina has an outstanding breath control very rare to find in these days. In his high notes you can find Corelli’s technique as his voice increases in volume when he reaches the upper register. Martin Muehle is an accomplished professional with a baritonal voice. Muehle has chosen well the repertoire that is suitable for his voice.


—John Flowers

1/23/2019 1:27 AM

There are many interesting qualities in Enrique Pina’s singing. First of all the excellent breath control. At the end of “Por Amor” he holds that A Natural for 19 seconds without any effort. This is something very impressive to me! In E Lucevan le Stelle he does a diminuendo in the Corelli style without any break in his sound. Another interesting quality in Pina is the easy top. Many tenors struggle to reach the high notes and their voices thin out. Instead, in Enrique his voice widens and rings in the top. At the beginning of “Granada” he reaches a B Flat effortlessly giving an excellent example of what singing “on the breath” is. Not to talk about his easy high C at the end. As far as I remember, only Corelli, Mario Lanza and maybe Kraus used to finish Granada in such a high note. Nowadays, you will not find a tenor with those qualities very easily. Martin Muehle is of a completely different kind of voice. He is more suitable for the Dramatic roles. His burnished timber alongwith his incredibly stage presence makes him an excellent Kalaf and Tonio. Muehle has an outstanding musicianship. In some passages of “L’Anima ho stanca” he reminded me Franco Corelli in his prime. In my opinion these two voices are completely different for different roles.


—Alfred Butters

1/23/2019 3:44 AM

Mr Pina would be advised to stay within his range of operetta and light music while Mr. Muehle clearly has a fine instrument made for grand opera and I look forward to hearing him in a theatre somewhere.


—Harald Hahn

1/23/2019 10:43 AM

Enrique Pina I have heard Enrique Pina singing this Granada live at the Santo Domingo National Theater last October 2018. I can assure without any doubt that this youtube video doesn’t make him justice at all! His voice is full of squillo and his high C at the end was impressively powerful and ringing. In my opinion Enrique is one of the few tenors who sings with the excellent technique of the great singers of the Golden age of Opera.



1/24/2019 6:26 AM

My opinion about the tenors Enrique Pina and Martin Moehle. By Vladimir Velázquez Matos. It is for those who write an honor to express my opinion on two magnificent tenors such as the Dominican Enrique Pina and the German-born Brazilian Martin Moehle on a website as prestigious as the Bel Canto Society, led by a musical scholar of world prestige as is Professor Stefan Zucker. Although I am not a lyrical singing specialist or a deep connoisseur or a musician by profession, I am a lover of Bel Canto and record collector of some of the great performers of that beautiful art, mainly a great admirer of which was to my understanding a of the greatest glories of the world lyric of the twentieth century: “Franco Corelli”, the most exuberant and miraculous voice of the second half of that century and teacher, as well as spiritual father, of one of the tenors that in this space I will comment, as is the much admired great artist and friend Enrique Pina. From Enrique I can say that he is a full lyrical tenor of a very consolidated school, that of Arturo Mellochi, inherited from his long-time teacher Franco Corelli, the technique of the larynx is low as well as floating, which, as can be seen in the videos with the aria: “E lucevan le stelle” and the songs “Por Amor” and “Granada”, allows you to perform not only the steps of the voice from chest to the head voice, using multiple dynamic mechanisms such as filatura and mezza voce in an exemplary manner, but to culminate the pieces he interprets with brilliant high notes of unblemished security, which can be extended by his incredible control of the fiato, which I believe is one of his trademarks. Another of his most notable characteristics is his interpretative quality, the sweet way of how he emits the phrases, his eloquent accents and his noble diction in the languages that he dominates, making him a very seductive artist and pleasant to the listener, with some more scenic ways, very discreet that accentuate his great gift: “the voice”. As Martin Moehle, he is undoubtedly a great voice of dramatic tenor, and even heroic, very much in the current of the Germanic voices in the style of the danish Roeswange, Jerusalem or Peter Hoffmann, handled with great success, expressiveness and beauty in all the extension of his sonorous column, only criticizing him a little parsimony in the dynamic elements, since he stays in the mezzo fortes, fortes and fortíssimos, very in the line of Mario del Monaco or Giuseppe Giacomini, but even so, he is an artist super large caliber. In short, they are two very different tenors by voice and school: one, Pina, a full lyricist in the best tradition of the Italian school; the other, Moehle, a dramatic characteristic of the great German school. For me, excellent both.


—Vladimir Velázquez Matos

1/25/2019 10:04 PM

Mr. Pina is a tenor who has yet to come into his own. His performance of Granada was more striking than the other pieces, he lost most of the drama brought by the Corelli technique. If only he could possibly blend the technique a bit more, we might get the best of both worlds, as exemplified by Mattrhew Polenzani in some of his repertoire. Now, as far as Martin Muehle is concerned, here is a voice that’s got it all together. I could listen to him forever. He truly has a vocal instrument similar to Corelli’s and I’m sorry I have not heard him before now. However, I am not totally sure if he has the power so brilliantly utilized by Corellli.


—David Younger

1/26/2019 12:18 AM

About Enrique Pina: Magnificent. Captivating. Charming voice timbre. Excellent voice and volume control. A jewel for art. A great pride for his country.


—Raquel Ortiz

2/8/2019 1:38 PM
I like Pina, but I still LOVE Caruso, Gigli, Corelli and Delmonaco. I’ll listen to these gods with a big dish of Pasta! The others are ImPASTAS! Muehle is loud and bland, not even “hearing aid” worthy!
—Nino Pantano


1/22/2019 7:11 AM



An Email From Martin Muehle

Dear Stefan,

The Trovatore went very well. Verdi is a genius. I feel so lucky and grateful to be able to sing such a role. Certainly I am not what you could call a belcanto singer. But I sing Manrico with passion and try to be as close to Verdi’s intentions as possible.

My colleague Angela Meade is an amazing Leonora. And she is a belcanto diva.

The public was very happy!

I wasn’t totally healthy during the production, but I managed to sing thru without problems.

I am now in Modena rehearsing Chenier. I will sing it in a circuit of theaters of the region (Modena, Piacenza, Reggio Emilia and Parma) from February 15, always two performances per city until April.

I hope you are doing well and better and getting farther with the Gigli book!

I just read a book by Juvarra about Del Monaco’s and Corelli’s technique, “Le teorire tecnico-vocali di Mario del Monaco e Franco Corelli.”

He quotes some of your interviews and books.

Here is a clip of the Trovatore “prison trio” from Seattle:

All the best,


Please write your review in the comment box below.

Stefan Zucker

Posted on

Francisco Araiza

by Stefan Zucker

After declining for 150 years, vocal virtuosity is on the upswing. In particular, 25 years ago few tenors sang roulades or high Cs. The number who do is steadily burgeoning, though their singing sometimes lacks personality, passion and charm.

The differences between Nicola Monti on a Melodram recording of a Naples performance of La cenerentola in 1958 and Francisco Araiza on a CBS studio recording of the opera from 1980 are representative of the typical differences among tenors—I’m tempted to say singers—then and now. Monti is sunny and ingratiating, his mezza voce caressing. But he omits the trills, smudges the coloratura at conductor Mario Rossi’s fast clip and sounds uncomfortable upstairs. The technical demands are beyond him and his range is simply too short: had the more difficult and high-flying passages not been cut, he probably would have been unable to sing the part.

Araiza sings it uncut, hitting all the notes—except the trills, which he too avoids. He has marvelous agility and velocity, and the high Cs hold no terrors. But, however proficient, he is charmless and mechanical. I have found no evidence that anyone in Rossini’s day produced his tone like Araiza, with the locus of resonation far forward in the face.

Compared to such turn-of-the-century interpreters of Almaviva in Il barbiere di Siviglia as Fernando De Lucia and Alessandro Bonci, Araiza is uninspired in his treatment of rhythm. Their singing abounds in rubato; his is comparatively four square.

Until recently, the music of every composer was interpreted in accordance with the performance practices not of the composer’s time but of the interpreter’s. De Lucia came of age musically around 1880, at the height of the Romantic era. His liberal use of rubato suggests Barbiere or, even more, La sonnambula had been composed then. His recordings, “Son geloso” in particular, challenge us to decide how literal one should be in construing Bellini’s tempos and rhythms. Did Bellini assume that a singer would use rubato so extensively? Did Bellini intend him to? Is De Lucia simply emphasizing romantic tendencies in Bellini’s music or is he adding something extraneous? Does the music benefit from his approach? Is he inspired or wayward? Where are the boundaries? De Lucia is inquiry stimulating. Bonci, no less sensitive to the music, is less extreme in his liberties—as is his successor Dino Borgioli.

Araiza is probably the best recent Belmonte, in Die Entführung aus dem Serail. At a 1984 performance at The Metropolitan Opera, he hit most of the notes dead on, with big, bright tones so well focused as to make intonation lapses more noticeable. In the notoriously florid “Ich baue ganz,” he was accurate in the stepwise passages, less so in the arpeggiated ones. He interpolated both a small cadenza before the repeat of the main theme and some ornamentation in the repeat itself—as well as a few extra breaths. He pronounced German well (unusual in an Hispanic singer) and acted energetically. But his singing was more impressive than beautiful. And he wasn’t very interesting: His dynamics were sometimes random, sometimes inert. He failed to emphasize melodic climaxes and to distinguish melody from ornamentation through volume or accentuations. He sang with little tenderness and was boring in tender passages. He hardly ever shaded his tone and managed to be vigorous yet dull.

To obtain precise articulation of florid passages Araiza aspirated. Many listeners—and some reviewers—find aspiration unendurable, yet musicologists and performers point to period writings suggesting that in the 17th and 18th centuries aspiration, or at least “detached” singing, was accepted practice. My own experience is that the clarity of articulation achievable with aspiration can prove useful in certain contexts. In special cases aspiration is highly desirable. For example, in the quartet in La scala di seta the tenor has triplets against the other singers’ duplets. I aspirated the triplets so as to differentiate the rhythm of my part from that of the others (Aspiration can be a crutch, and I am not advocating it be used promiscuously.) In Entführung, Araiza, for my taste, aspirated too heavily. [Araiza and I discuss aspiration in our radio interview, rebroadcast on this Website. The interview took place subsequent to the writing of this article.]

Singers sustain interest in many ways, interpretation and temperament among them. Luciano Pavarotti does so through charisma; Tito Schipa, through charisma, charm and musical sensitivity; Giuseppe Di Stefano, through passion and feeling for words; Enrico Caruso, through warmth and emotion. Araiza isn’t endowed with an extraordinary supply of these qualities. On a recording of lirico-spinto warhorses made in 1986, he relies instead on musical effects, such as contrasting soft singing with loud. His interpretations of the album’s two Puccini pieces, “Che gelida manina” and “E lucevan le stelle,” are satisfying, for in addition to alternating dynamics, he does sing with some tenderness and fervor. But in the aria from Eugene Onegin, one misses Dmitri Smirnoff’s plaintive quality, his wistful yearning. In the Arlesiana aria, Araiza lacks both bitter melancholy for the opening and desperation and slancio (surge, oomph) for the end—as well as vocal punch and core on the high As, where the voice is unassertive and veiled, particularly on dark vowels (ah, oh, oo). Perhaps the recording’s most underinterpreted selection is “Ah! fuyez, douce image” (Manon), where he sings as if he hadn’t considered the importance of the notes in relation to each other or thought about which leads ahead to which. In the middle voice he produces a strong round tone, but he doesn’t imbue the high B-flats with longing, pleading or desperation, nor is he able, in the alternative, to trumpet them forth; however, on higher notes, such as the Bohème aria’s C or the interpolated high D at the end of “Possente amor,” the voice takes on brilliance. Stylistically he is an anomaly: a latin singer with a German sound who achieves legato in the German manner since the 30s—almost without portamento. The music on the record, mostly from the late 19th century, was first performed by singers who used portamento generously.

Araiza is never tasteless. At his worst he is earthbound, offering conscientious observance of interpretation markings in the score without going beyond them. At his best he is an excellent singer who just misses striking sparks.

Since 1983 he gradually has undertaken more dramatic repertory although he has said it may force him to abandon high parts. Having already performed Rodolfo, Faust and Lohengrin, he is scheduled for Chénier and wants to do Alvaro, Carlo, Manrico and Max. He succeeded in florid repertory by virtue of technical prowess. In dramatic parts, however, his relatively bland vocal personality probably will tell against him. Further, he might produce a more heroic sound at the expense of vocal gleam. On a recent recording of Maria Stuarda, his tone is brassier but also thicker and coarser—the classic tradeoff.

Araiza has said that Neil Shicoff and Luis Lima are at the same point in their careers as he and are performing much of the same repertory. Of the three Shicoff has the prettiest middle voice but is the least expressive and musically secure, Lima has the greatest emotional intensity and Araiza the most proficiency. (Update: in La Juive at The Met, in 2003, Shicoff’s voice was untrue in pitch and coarse—but he finally found his soul. The tradeoff was worth it.)

This article, written in 1990, is reprinted from The International Dictionary of Opera and The St. James Opera Encyclopedia, with additions and minor changes.

Posted on

Erna Berger

As Violetta in Ave Maria
As Violetta in Ave Maria

Born October 19, 1900 in Cossebaude, outside Dresden, Erna Berger traveled with her parents to Paraguay after WW I. In 1924 she scraped together enough money to return to Germany, where she studied voice with Herta Boeckel and Melitta Hirzel, in Dresden. In 1925 she was engaged by Fritz Busch for the Sächsische Staatsoper there, making her debut as a Knabe in Die Zauberflöte. In 1928 she appeared there in the world premiere of Strauss’s Die Ägyptische Helena and in 1929 made her debut in Berlin’s Städtischen Oper (now the Deutsche Oper Berlin), in Hans Pfitzner’s Christelflein. Toscanini engaged her for the Junger Hirt in Tannhäuser, for the 1929 Bayreuth season, after which she sang the Erste Blumenmädchen and Waldvogel there. In 1932 she debuted in Salzburg, as Blondchen. In 1934 she joined the Berlin Staatsoper, where she continued for 30 seasons. Making her Covent Garden debut in 1934, where she returned in 1938 and 1947, in 1949-50 Berger sang at the Met, opening the season as Sophie, also appearing as Gilda, Der Königin der Nacht, Rosina, Woglinde and Waldvogel. After the war she gave concert tours in North America, South America, Australia and Japan. In 1960 she became a professor of singing at Hamburg’s Musikhochschüle and published her autobiography, Auf Flügeln des Gesanges. Erinnerungen einer Sängerin.(1) She died June 14, 1990 in Essen. A street in Dresden was renamed in her honor.

Her recordings include the Shepherd, in a Tannhäuser recorded by Columbia at Bayreuth in 1930, a 1938 Königin der Nacht, under Sir Thomas Beecham, two Gildas, respectively for RCA and Deutsche Grammophon, Hänsel und Gretel, Martha and Hoffmann’s Erzählungen for Urania, a live Ariadne auf Naxos from 1935, on BASF, and a film of Don Giovanni in 1954. She recorded songs and arias for Columbia, HMV, Polydor and Bellaphon and sings in Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony on the Bel Canto Society DVD D0052, Great Conductors of the Third Reich: Art in the Service of Evil

–Stefan Zucker

1. Erna Berger, Auf Flügeln des Gesanges. Erinnerungen einer Sängerin (Zurich: Atlantis Musikbuch, second edition, 1989)

Posted on

Fernando Corena and the Basso Buffo

by Stefan Zucker

The basso buffo tradition began in Naples in the early 18th century with the Casaccia family, who dominated buffo singing there for four generations, generally performing in dialect. Some members went in for broad comedy. Stendahl had this to say of Carlo Casaccia in connection with his appearance at the city’s Teatro dei Fiorentini in Pietro Carlo Guglielmi’s Paolo e Virginia in 1817:

[T]he famous Casaccia . . . is enormous, a fact that gives him opportunity for considerable pleasant buffoonery. When seated, he undertakes to give himself an appearance of ease by crossing his legs; impossible; the effort that he goes through topples him onto his neighbor; a general collapse. This actor, commonly called Casacciello, is adored by the public; he has the nasal voice of a Capuchin. At this theater everyone sings through his nose.

During the 18th century two types of buffo emerged: the “buffo nobile,” or noble comic, and the “buffo caricato,” or exaggerated comic. The same singers who undertook “basso cantante” or non-comic lyric bass roles also frequently sang those for buffo nobile, for they are similar in vocal demands, often requiring virtuosity. Buffo caricato parts, on the other hand, were a specialty, calling for falsetto singing in imitation of women and, above all, patter singing or chatter. Beauty of tone is of small consequence for a buffo caricato, mastery of comic effect essential. The part of Don Basilio in Il barbiere di Siviglia is for buffo nobile, that for Don Bartolo in the same opera for buffo caricato. The florid passages for Mustafà in L’Italiana in Algeri are not very different from those for Assur in Semiramide, and in fact both roles were written for Filippo Galli, who moved comfortably between the nobile and cantante genres. On the other hand Taddeo in L’Italiana is a patter part.

Fernando Corena had wonderful flair as a buffo caricato, his best role: Bartolo—at first grand and expansive, exuding self-importance and pomposity, then sputtering with outrage. He invariably stole the show. But when he crossed over into parts for basso cantante, such as Il conte Rodolfo in La sonnambula or those for buffo nobile, such as Mustafà, he sounded ungainly—labored in coloratura and spread in pitch. Still, his voice was truer than that of Salvatore Baccaloni, his immediate predecessor. Corena was able to swat out Mustafà’s Gs, beyond the range of many basses; however, particularly in later years he sounded effortful in the high tessitura of the L’elisir d’amore entrance aria, with its many Es. His voice retained substance no matter how quickly he chattered. And he was masterful at caricaturing women in falsetto, for example, at the interpolated words “sul tamburo” in Barbiere. In recordings of arias from Le Caïd and Philemon et Baucis, although he lacks the coloratura facility, impeccable legato and pinpoint accuracy of intonation of the legendary Pol Plançon, he sings with more personality, exuberance and variety of tonal inflection. Plançon dazzles, but Corena’s more fun.

On stage, Baccaloni, a comedian, was never out of character. He claimed to have prepared five ways to play each moment, once remarking, “I choose. Only a fool improvises.” Corena, a clown, often improvised—and frequently amused himself by playing pranks on other singers. He was better at expressing extroverted feelings than deep dark emotions. Portraying Falstaff as a clown, he failed to capture the character’s reflective side. As Leporello he was a delight in the “Catalogue” aria, somewhat of a disappointment toward the opera’s end. As Don Pasquale he was a triumph—except in those passages calling for pathos. Above all, Corena excelled at detailing foibles and pomposity. He was pre-eminent in his repertoire from the mid-50s until the late 70s.

This article, written in 1991, is reprinted from The International Dictionary of Opera and The St. James Opera Encyclopedia, with additions and minor changes.

Posted on

Franco’s Big Break

A letter from Marina Boagno, author of Corelli: A Man, A Voice

According to the Tosca film credits, Sciarrone is one Aldo Relli. This is the stage name of Ubaldo Corelli, Franco’s brother. One might think, here is a typical case of nepotism: the famous tenor bringing in some family. Instead, it was the other way around. Ubaldo, a good baritone, had graduated from the Santa Cecilia Conservatory and was taking his career rather easy. He had been comfortably singing small roles for a number of years when he was chosen for Sciarrone.

Ubaldo heard that Carmine Gallone was looking for a good-looking young tenor to act Cavaradossi. The director’s intention was to have Ferruccio Tagliavini record the music. Ubaldo, who was friendly with Gallone, showed him a photo of his “baby brother.” Not only was Franco handsome, but, Ubaldo insisted, he also was very good at singing. Gallone met the young tenor—and that is how Franco Corelli came to be cast as Cavaradossi.

Posted on

Robert Merrill

by Stefan Zucker

Gifted with a powerful, resonant and biting voice, Robert Merrill is supposed to have quipped, “When in doubt, sing loud.” In fact, he almost never sang any way but loud. He had a plangent sound but frequently sang as if by rote, failing to communicate rhythmic pulse, much less musical ebb and flow or feeling for drama in music. For him the basic unit of utterance was the note, not the phrase. The notes themselves stayed more or less at the same volume and thus lacked dynamic direction. As a result he couldn’t prepare emphases with crescendos. This, combined with his tendency to treat legato passages as if they were declamation and to substitute bluster and cliched snarls for emotional substance, caused much of the music he sang to sound jagged. Nevertheless, his legato was excellent, for he was able to join notes together seamlessly (unlike many Americans who habitually disrupt legato passages with sudden, quick diminuendos before the consonants d and t).

Continue reading Robert Merrill

Posted on

Gianna Pederzini

“Gianna Pederzini had personality and charisma and was a great artist. Her voice was beautiful: round and dark. When I sang Carmen with her, in 1953, she was no longer young, but she still had an exceptional figure. She had strong eyes, green, the color of steel. She was a beautiful woman—beautiful face, beautiful nose, the most beautiful legs in opera. She knew how to be beautiful and to impose her beauty in the theater. She was a real woman. I was lost in her arms.”—Franco Corelli, discreetly, in the presence of his wife, on the radio program “Opera Fanatic,” July 20, 1991

Continue reading Gianna Pederzini

Posted on

Gertrude Pitzinger

Gertrude Pitzinger (1904-c. 1996), contralto, was born in Mährisch-Schänberg (Krásná Hora), in what became Czechoslovakia. After teaching school, in 1926 she received a diploma from the Vienna Music Academy, in music teaching. She studied lieder with Julia Culp. Pitzinger sang her first concert in 1929, in Olmütz (Olomouc), Czechoslovakia. From 1935 until World War II she gave concerts in Austria, Denmark, Italy, Norway, Holland and Belgium. In 1937 she sang in Beethoven’s Ninth in London under Furtwängler, and she appeared in 1938 at Carnegie Hall and The Town Hall, New York. In 1937 and 1941 she performed in Prague; 1941 brought her to Holland. Until 1940 Pitzinger could be heard regularly in concerts and lieder recitals in Berlin. At the Salzburg Festival she sang, among other things, Dvorák’s Stabat Mater, 1934, Mozart’s Requiem, 1951-1959, Beethoven’s Missa Solemnis, 1955-1957, and Handel’s Judas Makkabäus, 1953. She particularly was known as a Bach interpreter.

The Czechs viewed her as a collaborator, so in 1945 she had to leave her homeland and lived at first in Landsitz, in the Black Forest. After 1959 she was a Professor at the Musikhochschule, in Frankfurt am Main, and continued to give concerts. She was married to the Danish concert singer Otto Dupont. Later in life she became a personal friend of the American right-wing extremist Lyndon LaRouche and his wife, the German Helga Zepp-LaRouche, heads of the German political party Patriotten für Deutschland.

Pitzinger’s recordings are on Amadeo, Quadrigafon, DGG (Mozart’s Requiem, Bruckner’s Te Deum, lieder) and on BASF (Brahms lieder).
–Stefan Zucker

The above essay was excerpted from the booklet to Great Conductors of the Third Reich: Art in the Service of Evil.

Posted on

Giovanni Battista Rubini: Last of a Breed

Excerpted from The Origins of Modern Tenor Singing

Giovanni Battista Rubini Ruled as the Paragon of Virtuoso Tenors, King of the High Fs
by Stefan Zucker

Rubini was Bellini’s favorite tenor. In a letter to his friend and confidant Francesco Florimo, the composer observed, “You have good reason to say that at the entrance of Rubini [in Il pirata] it seemed to you as if you were seeing an angel, for he said it [the music] with an incomprehensible divineness….” At the time of his death, Bellini was about to refashion Norma for Rubini for the 1835-36 season of the Théâtre-Italien. Specifically he was going to replace the tenor aria and the Pollione-Adalgisa duet, add a second tenor aria and rework most of the tenor lines. Though Bellini died before he could make these revisions, Rubini went on to become the most famous Pollione of his day. When he was unable to appear in a series of Norma performances at the Italien in 1837 because of illness, the Parisian audience became dispirited and could take no pleasure in Norma or any other opera. Continue reading Giovanni Battista Rubini: Last of a Breed

Posted on

Tito Schipa

Tito Schipa’s was the most lyrical sensibility of them all, the most elegiac, sublime and endearing (with the exception of Giuseppe Anselmi). Schipa’s singing was conversational in its intimacy. He reconciled the conflicting demands of legato and diction so as to excel at both. No Italian tenor on records has imbued words with more significance. Since Fernando De Lucia, Alessandro Bonci and Dino Borgioli, no Italian tenor has equalled Schipa’s expressive use of rubato (taking time from one note or group of notes and giving it to others). He composed songs and an operetta, conducted orchestras, spoke a number of languages and wrote an autobiography.

Schipa was one of the last tenori di grazia, an anomaly in the age of the verismo tenor, in a century with a mania for heavy voices, voices with volume. If anything, as an interpreter he understated. Like Anselmi and Borgioli, to be truly appreciated he first had to leave Italy. In this country he was lionized like a Hollywood matinee idol and, although married with children, made love to a legion of women. His obsessively jealous wife became an alcoholic. They separated. At 57 he had a second family, with a woman 35 years his junior–and continued with what his son describes as his “incorrigible don-juanism.” (It later emerged that Schipa had had a daughter by still another woman.) His fees were the equivalent of any opera star’s ever, but he squandered much of the money and because of his ex-wife and bad business deals lost the rest. After the war he was dogged here, in Europe and South America by accusations by Walter Winchell, among others, that he had been “Mussolini’s tenor.”

I studied with Schipa but subsequently took my singing in a different direction. His real legacy is his records and films, of which I Sing for You Alone is the first of ten full-length features. (The film also was released under the title Three Lucky Fools.) Particularly before dubbing was introduced, in 1935, it was not unusual to shoot several versions of the same film, each in a different language, with many variations in detail, including supporting casts. Schipa also made I Sing for You Alone in Italian as Tre uomini in frac (of which no prints appear to survive) and in French as Trois hommes en habit (#655). He sings some songs in French in the French version that are in English in the English version.

In both versions he is at his most caressing and works his magic on eight songs including “Marechiare.” The plot: He breaks on a high note because of stage fright. They boo him savagely and run him out of town, but in the end he sings a concert and subjugates them. Lovely print.–Stefan Zucker